Building Code Administrators and Inspectors Florida Principle and Practice Licensure Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the Building Code Administrators and Inspectors Florida Principle and Practice Licensure Exam. Prepare with detailed insights and exam tips. Ensure success in your licensure exam!

Practice this question and more.


Is compliance with paragraph 206.4 required for altered entrances if there is an accessible route?

  1. Yes, always

  2. No, never required

  3. Only if it is a main entrance

  4. Only if specified by local regulations

The correct answer is: No, never required

Compliance with paragraph 206.4 addresses requirements related to accessible entrances in the context of alterations within existing structures. In circumstances where an accessible route already exists leading to altered entrances, the requirement for further compliance with this paragraph is not mandated. This means that if an existing pathway meets accessibility standards, there is no obligation to modify entrance features to enhance compliance. This is rooted in the understanding that existing accessibility provisions may satisfy the intent of the law without necessitating additional alterations for every entrance that undergoes changes. Therefore, the specific context of how an entrance integrates with existing accessible routes determines the necessity for compliance. In cases where the question discusses main entrances or local regulations, these may have additional stipulations, but they do not override the foundational principle that, if there is already an accessible route in place, further compliance with that specific paragraph is not required.